Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] vs Andrea Vavassori [293rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W L W W L L W L
Form
W W L W W W W L L LH2H: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Vavassori
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Vavassori winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Vavassori was at the Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai, 22-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
Andrea Vavassori | 0 |
Zandschulp | Stats | Vavassori |
---|---|---|
42% (8-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (7-4) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
89 | Ranking | 293 |
22 | Highest Rank | 128 |
29 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | R |
7 | Titles | 0 |
62% (361-225) | Career Total W/L | 56% (303-235) |
$3,420,360 | Career Prize Money | $440,185 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zandschulp VS Vavassori H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
Zandschulp VS Vavassori H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:5:51 | Average Match Time | 1:5:51 |
73% (36/49) | 1st Serve % | 50% (24/48) |
75% (27/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (14/24) |
62% (8/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
50% (24/48) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Andrea Vavassori Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Vavassori
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Vavassori has won 46.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vavassori has won 43.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.33% and 25.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vavassori has saved 56.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 51.47% of matches played (W/L 35/ 33), with Vavassori winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Vavassori has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 86/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Vavassori has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Vavassori being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Vavassori winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Vavassori was at the Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai, 22-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Vavassori have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Vavassori 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Vavassori 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 137.66 while Vavassori has played against players with an average rank of 172.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vavassori has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 30.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vavassori has converted 25.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Andrea Vavassori Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Zsombor Piros
Player
Andrea Vavassori
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
2
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Andrea Vavassori
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
67 of
117)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
46 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Alexis Galarneau
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Andrea Vavassori
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-7(3) 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Zandschulp vs Vavassori?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zandschulp Vs Vavassori is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (361/225) | Win/Loss | 56% (303/235) |
58% (822/586) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (692/574) |
53% (7057/6235) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6302/5793) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
2857 | Aces Total | 2047 |
0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
2125 | Total Double Faults | 1773 |
1:35:25 | Average Match Time | 1:23:41 |
384.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.71 |
62% (23829/38718) | 1st Serve % | 62% (19729/32023) |
71% (17021/23829) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (13967/19729) |
48% (7177/14892) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6118/12295) |
43% (1767/4096) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1257/2967) |
41% (16238/39906) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12332/31834) |
62% (334/535) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (294/524) |
53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (5/9) |
56% (100/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (102/200) |
58% (111/193) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (98/183) |
89% (340/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (295/250) |
11% (340/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (295/45) |
24% (244/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (243/51) |
See recent tennis photos of Zandschulp and Vavassori
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
View full predicted draw for Zandschulp in Munich
Other Predictions
- Loading news...